![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Help us raise funds and gather signatures for the November 2013 Ballot. Click on the icons above to see the map, see all our supporters, and learn more about the campaign. Also, please consider contributing to the campaign! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State Senator Jeanne Kohl-Welles |
Seattle is among the last cities in the country with over 500,000 residents without district elections. |
Government officials are too removed from their citizens unless there is at least one elected official who actually lives in and speaks for the citizens and the district's needs. |
At budget time or when other critical decisions are made affecting your area, a 7-2 system means you’ll have someone who specifically represents your area while retaining councilmembers representing the whole city – the best of both worlds. |
Too often, local neighborhood needs – public safety, small business concerns, infrastructure (roads, sidewalks, and bridges), parks – get ignored while powerful constituencies & special interests are lavished with attention. District representation ensures a fair distribution of benefits and costs of public actions and policies. |
Each district holds about 50,000 voters. This allows grassroots candidates and the replacement of unresponsive incumbents with good old fashion legwork and people power. By contrast, under the existing citywide system, you need $250,000-$300,000 just to match the incumbent’s war chest and get your message out to city’s 600,000 residents. Too many qualified grassroots candidates are beaten before they even start. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||